Clarence Darrow

Clarence Darrow

Clarence Darrow (b. 1857) is best known for defending Jewish serial killers Leopold and Loeb, as well as Darwinian evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial.

"The Leopold and Loeb case raised, in a well-publicized trial, Darrow's lifelong contention that psychological, physical, and environmental influences—not a conscious choice between right and wrong—control human behavior. Darrow's psychiatric expert witnesses testified that both boys "were decidedly deficient in emotion". Darrow later argued that emotion is necessary for the decisions that people make: When someone tries to go against a certain law or custom that is forbidden, he wrote, he should feel a sense of revulsion. As neither Leopold nor Loeb had a working emotional system, they did not feel revolted."

He repeatedly stressed the ages of the "boys" (before the Vietnam War, the age of majority was 21) and noted that "never had there been a case in Chicago where on a plea of guilty a boy under 21 had been sentenced to death."

In January 1931 Darrow had a debate with English writer G. K. Chesterton during the latter's second trip to America. This was held at New York City's Mecca Temple. The topic was "Will the World Return to Religion?". At the end of the debate those in the hall were asked to vote for the man they thought had won the debate. Darrow received 1,022 votes while Chesterton received 2,359 votes.

Clarence Darrow's father was an ardent abolitionist and a proud iconoclast and religious freethinker. He was known throughout the town as the "village infidel". Emily Darrow, Clarence's mother, was an early supporter of female suffrage and a women's rights advocate.

I argue that Darrow, like Reverend William King, was the product of the so-called "Second Great Awakening." The Second Great Awakening reflected Romanticism characterized by enthusiasm, emotion, and an appeal to the super-natural. It rejected the skeptical rationalism and deism of the Enlightenment.

Postmillennialism theology dominated American Protestantism in the first half of the 19th century. Postmillennialists believed that Christ will return to earth after the "millennium", which could entail either a literal 1000 years or a figurative "long period" of peace and happiness. Christians thus had a duty to purify society in preparation for that return. This duty extended beyond American borders to include Christian Restorationism. George Fredrickson argues that Postmillennial theology "was an impetus to the promotion of Progressive reforms, as historians have frequently pointed out."

Women made up the majority of converts during the Awakening. Husbands, especially in the South, sometimes disapproved of their wives' conversion, forcing women to choose between submission to God or their spouses. Church membership and religious activity gave women peer support and place for meaningful activity outside the home, providing many women with communal identity and shared experiences.

The greatest change in women's roles stemmed from participation in newly formalized missionary and reform societies. Women's prayer groups were an early and socially acceptable form of women's organization. Through their positions in these organizations, women gained influence outside of the private sphere.

Changing demographics of gender also affected religious doctrine. In an effort to give sermons that would resonate with the congregation, ministers stressed Christ's humility and forgiveness, in what the historian Barbara Welter calls a "feminization" of Christianity.

Revivals and perfectionist hopes of improving individuals and society continued to increase from 1840 to 1865, especially in urban areas. Evangelists attacked slavery, greed, and poverty. The influence of the Awakening continued in the form of more secular movements. In the midst of shifts in theology and church polity, American Christians began progressive movements to reform society through anti-drug crusades, women's rights, and abolitionism.

The First Great Awakening (1730–1755) pulled religion down to the level of the average person and did away with ritual, ceremony, sacramentalism and hierarchy. The revivalist movement increased the number of African slaves and free blacks who were converted to Christianity. Evangelical preachers "sought to include every person in conversion, regardless of gender, race, and status."

In the Third Great Awakening (1850-1900) "drys" crusaded in the name of religion for the prohibition of alcohol. The Woman's Christian Temperance Union mobilized Protestant women for social crusades against liquor, pornography and prostitution, and sparked the demand for woman suffrage.[10] The Gilded Age plutocracy came under sharp attack from the Social Gospel preachers and with reformers in the Progressive Era. Historian Robert Fogel identifies numerous reforms, especially the battles involving child labor, compulsory elementary education and the protection of women from exploitation in factories.

Oscar De Priest



Looks pretty admixed to me.

In 1929, US First Lady Lou Hoover invited Jessie DePriest, the wife of black Republican Chicago congressman Oscar DePriest, to tea at the White House. Southern politicians and journalists responded with vitriolic attacks.

The Chicago district represented by Oscar DePriest had a reputation for corruption, and until then the couple had been shunned by Washington's high society.

The Texas, Florida, Georgia and Mississippi legislatures issued condemnations. Texas's only female state legislator, Margie Neal, raged, "Mrs Hoover has violated the most sacred social custom of the White House, and this should be condemned," and South Carolina Democratic Senator Coleman Blease inserted a poem entitled "Niggers in the White House" into a resolution which was read aloud on the floor of the United States Senate — though the resolution, including the poem, was by unanimous agreement excised from the Congressional Record due to protests from Republican senators.

Between 1889 and 1917, De Priest built a fortune in the stock market and in real estate by helping black families move into formerly all-white neighborhoods.

He stepped down as alderman in 1917 after being indicted for alleged graft, but was acquitted after hiring Clarence Darrow to defend him.

See my article on Clarence Darrow.

History of European Abolitionism


Francis Daniel Pastorius

Francis Daniel Pastorius (born September 26, 1651, died at age 70 in 1720) was a poet and the founder of Germantown, Pennsylvania (now part of Philadelphia). Germantown was the first permanent German settlement in America.

In 1688 he drafted the first protest against slavery in America. Pastorius was a cosigner of the 1688 Germantown Quaker Petition Against Slavery (cosigned by Mennonites like Pastorius), the first petition against slavery made in the English colonies.

Abolitionism is usually understood in neo-reactionary circles as an outgrown of WASP 'Calvinism' or 'low church Protestant theology.' While the Mennonites could be understood as low church Protestants, they are distinctively outside of the WASP category.

Abolitionism is a signal. The fact that it developed out of both Anglo-Saxon and German communities suggests that it was not a product of a unique cultural history of England, but was the product of a certain genetic and environmental background. Both Anglo-Saxons and Germans are broadly Teutonic, while their countries were some of the wealthiest in Europe. As religious outcasts, Quakers and Mennonites emphasized the slave morality interpretation of the Bible. They sympathized with other oppressed groups.

Ultimately, slavery was a terrible deal for America. Had the practice been abolished in 1688:

1. No more slaves would have been brought over in the slave trade. Thomas Jefferson began the halt of the slave trade in 1778 when he made it a crime for traders to bring in slaves from out of state or from overseas for sale. However, congress did not abolish the importation of Africans from overseas until 1808.

2. Whites would not have supported black families. Because of the institution of slavery, white slave owners had an incentive to breed more slaves. Therefore, they supported black families with food and housing. Without the institution of slavery, blacks would have been left out in the cold. The black birth rate would have suffered.

3. There would have been more White immigration to America. Without slavery as a source of labor, White labor would have been in greater demand, driving wages up. With more opportunities for employment, more Europeans would have been incentivized to leave their homelands for America.

The result of these three effects would have been a smaller proportion of Blacks in America. It would also not allow for the myth that Black people built America.

Because White people have a lower tendency toward sociopathy and narcissism than other races, we will always have a contingent among our people, like Quakers and Mennonites, who advocate for the poorest and sorriest among us. And, like the abolitionists, they will almost always be successful in the long run. Therefore, we should make sure that the people they advocate for are racially compatible with our own kind. Otherwise, this pathological altruism becomes a carcinogen of racial cancer.

Because we cannot exterminate the upper bell curve of altruism from our people, we must have total racial separatism.