Debunking the "Christian" Pogroms

#JewLivesMatter

It is not unusual to find a jewish Religious Studies professor who teaches classes on Christianity. In fact, many of the students in such a class will not be Christians, and some will be jews. Universalist[1] Religious Studies courses take a critical approach which most traditional Christians will find unfaithful. But many jews--even the Talmudic scholars who believe Jesus boils in eternal torment for his crimes--find such courses interesting.

Jewish interest in understanding goyish culture comes not from the desire to connect in a compassionate way, or from a place of respect and awe, but from a place of fear and suspicion. No matter how objective, cold, and distanced jews appear, they are ultimately, at their root, driven by a fear of the ever-dormant Nazi within Western civilization, waiting to unleash itself.

Jews, like Saul of Tarsus, have studied, dissected, and analyzed Christianity for thousands of years. They have used this understanding of Christianity to their tactical advantage. With the rise of Christian Zionism, one could say that they have even hi-jacked or hacked Christianity, to the point where jewish elites control all Catholics and mainline Protestants from the top down.

The judeoskeptic Christian objects that during the first Crusade, jews were subject to Christian pogroms, and that the Holy Land was conquered for the sake of Christians, not jews.[2]

Yet these pograms were carried out by individual princes, dukes, and barons such as Emich of Flonheim who were disloyal to jewish usury and the Catholic Church. Their actions were opposed by the Church on the doctrinal rationale that "the Jews must be preserved until the return of Yeshu, when they will supposedly serve as witnesses to their own crimes."[3] The true reason was that the Roman Church and all the descendants of Charlemagne were always dependent on Jewish usury for their finances.

Movements against jews (such as forced conversions by King Robert the Pious of France, Richard II, Duke of Normandy, and Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor around 1007–1012) were quashed by Roman Catholicism.

"The pogroms were decried by many Christians of the day. Some even pointed to these crimes as the reason God forsook their fellow crusaders[...]."[4]

The Catholic Bishop Cosmas attempted to prevent forced conversions, and the entire Catholic hierarchy in Bohemia preached against the based jew-bashing.

“It certainly seems amazing that [...] such massacres [against the jews] should have taken place, despite their widespread disapproval and their condemnation as contrary to religion. [...] they occurred in the face of excommunication imposed by numerous clergymen, and of the threat of punishment on the part of many princes.”[5]

There you have it: the Christian church was always against pogroms. That some jew-bashers were also Christians was incidental to them being normal human beings not totally controlled by greed and usury.

[1] Universalism: the ideology of the University or college system.

[2] Eisen, Yosef. The Bloody Crusades. "Once [the Christians arrived in Jerusalem], they gathered all the Jews of Jerusalem into the central synagogue and set it afire. Other Jews, who had climbed to the roof of Al-Aksa mosque on the Temple Mount, were caught and beheaded."

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid. "St. Bernard, the Crusade’s official preacher, (assigned that role by the Pope), tried to stop the killings by citing the Church's traditional view that the Jews must be preserved until the return of Yeshu, when they will supposedly serve as witnesses to their own crimes."

[5] Snell, Melissa. The People's Crusade.

[6] Baron, Salo Wittmayer. Social and Religious History of the Jews, Volume 4. Columbia University Press, 1957.

#JewFeelsMatter

 Hello Merchant my old friend...

In March 1949, Life magazine[1] featured this article:

"Fagin in Berlin Provokes a Riot
Jews clash with German police over the showing of "Oliver Twist"

The pictures from Berlin last week were like photographs of an old nightmare. Here again, as there had been a decade ago, were club-swinging police and mauled and battered Jews. On two successive nights the Jews and police fought with clubs, rocks and firehoses around the Kurbel Theater in Berlin's British sector.

This outbreak, however, was prompted by an attempt to show the J. Arthur Rank motion picture, Oliver Twist. A faithful picturization of the Dickens classic, Oliver Twist has "the Jew Fagin" as its principal villain. Berlin Jews--mostly non-German DPs [stormfag edit: displaced persons means recent immigrants from Poland]--felt this characterization was viciously anti-Semitic and demonstrated against the film both inside and outside the theater. German police were called; the riot followed. The next night demonstrators again engaged police; this time they were reinforced by a petition--signed by Berlin's Lord Mayor--urging withdrawal of the film. British military authorities refused to interfere, but the exhibitors finally gave in. By then the damage had been done. One leading German editor, noting an ominous tendency to blame Jews for Berlin's black markets, wrote that the local reaction to the demonstration had shown "frightening examples of the existence of anti-Semitic circles."

We wud nevah be involved in something like that, goy...

Was Oliver Twist actually as anti-Semitic as the Berlin riots would indicate? Americans could not judge on the evidence of the film itself. Protests by U.S. Jewish groups last fall prevented its release here. In England critics praised the picture, and Director David Lean pleaded guilty only to fidelity to Dickens; pointing out that he had modeled his character on the Cruikshank illustrations. Not once in the picture, the Rank organization added, was Fagin called a Jew. Moreover the Englishman Bill Sikes was just as villainous.

While all of these things were true, it was also true that Dickens himself and his great illustrator Cruikshank had conceived Fagin as a savage racial caricature. In the novel Fagin is described as "a very old shriveled Jew, whose villainous-looking and repulsive face was obscured by a quantity of matted red hair." He also is called (by Bill Sikes) an "infernal, rich, plundering, thundering old Jew" and (by Dickens) a "wily old Jew."

In Dickens' and Cruikshank's time this perhaps had seemed an unimportant literary matter. But between Dickens and Director Lean history had interposed the ghosts of six million murdered Jews and the specter of genocide. It was hard to see why the producers of Oliver Twist had insisted on such complete fidelity and it was harder still to guess why the authorities had not only permitted exhibition of the picture in Germany but refused to withdraw it immediately after the inevitable reaction came."

Under pictures, there are the captions:

"Police use clubs in attempt to halt angry Jews storming Kurbel Theater. Before riots ended 35 Jews had been injured and three arrested. Seven policemen were hurt."

And:

"Door of theater where Oliver Twist was being shown is smashed by Jewish demonstrators who five times broke through police cordon established around playhouse."

The #BlackLivesMatter movement is an eerie ((echo)) of Polish-Jewish protests in Berlin which #BurnedThatBitchDown in 1949, over 66 years ago. Same shit, different decade.

Rioting Jew in a moment of confusion, looking for his kippah which fell during the chaos.

That German mayor of the British sector of Berlin, who signed the Jewish petition and encouraged the violence, was Ernst Reuter (surprisingly, no evidence of echo). He acted as the Stephanie Rawlings-Blake of "capitalist" Berlin. Rawlings-Blake, after all, is the mayor who gave Dindus "space to destroy" during riots in Baltimore.

A little background on Ernst Reuter might reveal how this protest was allowed to succeed. In 1914, he openly opposed the German monarchy. After being drafted, Reuter was "wounded and captured" by Russians during the Bolshevik Revolution (a likely story). In captivity, Reuter joined the Bolsheviks and "organized" his fellow prisoners. In 1917, Lenin sent him to Saratov to lead the Volga German Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic.

Ernst Reuter's spiritual father.

Upon his return to Germany, Reuter joined the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) and was named the First Secretary of its Berlin section. He embraced a position on the left wing of the party, endorsing an open rebellion in March 1921.

In 1933, with the Nazis now in power, he was forced to abdicate his positions and was brought to the concentration camp Lichtenburg. After his release, he went into exile in Turkey in 1935 where he stayed until the end to the Nazi era.

This man was literally a Bolshevik commissar, in charge of the ((British)) ((capitalist)) sector of Berlin. So much for "muh capitalist allies." He was a prisoner of the Nazis, a traitor who advocated open revolt, who was allowed by Hitler to go free without death penalty. So much for "muh holocaust."

The whole thing makes me sick.

[1] Life magazine, 7 March 1949.